From yan...@google.com on August 25, 2011 05:25:35

Thanks for the feedback. I agree that for Google App Engine it is ideally better to access the Datastore API directly. We do want to keep the JDO-based implementation for use with other web servers.

Can you give us a sense of how important this is for you? In other words, is it just an inconvenience, or is it a serious burden from using this library? I'm just trying to get a sense of the priority of this issue.

Reference: https://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/datastore/package-summary.html

Status: Accepted
Owner: moshe...@google.com
Cc: yan...@google.com rmis...@google.com
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement

From szieg...@cloudsherpas.com on August 27, 2011 03:12:00

Sure. That makes sense of course. It is only an inconvenience as it messes with our Eclipse project build path, adds an unnecessary step to our build (that we can remove), and causes us to maintain a jar that doesn't need to exist for our project otherwise. All this only amounts to a minor annoyance so far.

From yan...@google.com on December 08, 2011 12:19:27

Owner: yan...@google.com
Cc: -yan...@google.com moshe...@google.com

From yan...@google.com on February 28, 2012 17:12:26

Status: Fixed
Labels: Milestone-Version1.7.0 Component-OAuth2

From yan...@google.com on March 12, 2012 12:52:57

Summary: App Engine DataStore API