Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JacksonFactory.createJsonParser should throw NullPointerException on null input #79

Closed
wonderfly opened this issue Jan 9, 2015 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor

From yan...@google.com on March 27, 2012 10:06:47

External references, such as a standards document, or specification? N/A Java environments (e.g. Java 6, Android 2.3, App Engine, or All)? All Please describe the feature requested. JacksonFactory.createJsonParser should throw NullPointerException on null input for consistency with GsonFactory. Since we do our testing primarily with JacksonFactory we don't realize that some of our code fails with a NullPointerException when run with GsonFactory. Best way to ensure we catch these problems is to cause JacksonFactory to fail in these cases as well.

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-http-java-client/issues/detail?id=79

@wonderfly wonderfly added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. imported priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. labels Jan 9, 2015
@wonderfly wonderfly self-assigned this Jan 9, 2015
@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on March 27, 2012 10:09:23

http://codereview.appspot.com/5935043/

Status: Started
Cc: rmis...@google.com

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on March 28, 2012 06:20:46

Status: Fixed

clundin25 pushed a commit to clundin25/google-http-java-client that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant