Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executeAsInputStream in JsonHttpRequest and JsonHttpClient #76

Closed
wonderfly opened this issue Jan 9, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

executeAsInputStream in JsonHttpRequest and JsonHttpClient #76

wonderfly opened this issue Jan 9, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor

From yan...@google.com on March 23, 2012 06:15:22

External references, such as a standards document, or specification? http://javadoc.google-http-java-client.googlecode.com/hg/1.7.0-beta/com/google/api/client/http/json/JsonHttpRequest.html http://javadoc.google-http-java-client.googlecode.com/hg/1.7.0-beta/com/google/api/client/http/json/JsonHttpClient.html Java environments (e.g. Java 6, Android 2.3, App Engine, or All)? All Please describe the feature requested. Request is to add an executeAsInputStream method that simply does executeUnparsed().getContent(). This is convenient in some use cases if all you need is the InputStream, e.g. when downloading media. Make sure the JavaDoc clearly indicates that it is the caller's responsibility to close the stream. While we're doing that, we should probably also add that comment to executeUnparsed.

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-http-java-client/issues/detail?id=76

@wonderfly wonderfly added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. imported priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. labels Jan 9, 2015
@wonderfly wonderfly self-assigned this Jan 9, 2015
@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From rmis...@google.com on March 26, 2012 05:41:21

http://codereview.appspot.com/5892044/

Status: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant