My favorites | Sign in
Google
                
Search
for
Updated Nov 18, 2009 by christianedwardgruber
BindingAnnotations  

Binding Annotations

Occasionally you'll want multiple bindings for a same type. For example, you might want both a PayPal credit card processor and a Google Checkout processor. To enable this, bindings support an optional binding annotation. The annotation and type together uniquely identify a binding. This pair is called a key.

Defining a binding annotation requires two lines of code plus several imports. Put this in its own .java file or inside the type that it annotates.

package example.pizza;

import com.google.inject.BindingAnnotation;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.PARAMETER;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.FIELD;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD;

@BindingAnnotation @Target({ FIELD, PARAMETER, METHOD }) @Retention(RUNTIME)
public @interface PayPal {}

You don't need to understand all of these meta-annotations, but if you're curious:

To depend on the annotated binding, apply the annotation to the injected parameter:

public class RealBillingService implements BillingService {

  @Inject
  public RealBillingService(@PayPal CreditCardProcessor processor,
      TransactionLog transactionLog) {
    ...
  }

Lastly we create a binding that uses the annotation. This uses the optional annotatedWith clause in the bind() statement:

    bind(CreditCardProcessor.class)
        .annotatedWith(PayPal.class)
        .to(PayPalCreditCardProcessor.class);

@Named

Guice comes with a built-in binding annotation @Named that uses a string:

public class RealBillingService implements BillingService {

  @Inject
  public RealBillingService(@Named("Checkout") CreditCardProcessor processor,
      TransactionLog transactionLog) {
    ...
  }

To bind a specific name, use Names.named() to create an instance to pass to annotatedWith:

    bind(CreditCardProcessor.class)
        .annotatedWith(Names.named("Checkout"))
        .to(CheckoutCreditCardProcessor.class);

Since the compiler can't check the string, we recommend using @Named sparingly.

Binding Annotations with Attributes

Guice supports binding annotations that have attribute values. In the rare case that you need such an annotation:

  1. Create the annotation @interface.
  2. Create a class that implements the annotation interface. Follow the guidelines for equals() and hashCode() specified in the Annotation Javadoc. Pass an instance of this to the annotatedWith() binding clause.


Comment by jchwasto...@gmail.com, Aug 28, 2009

You probably wanted:

bind(CreditCardProcessor.class)
     .annotatedWith(Names.named("Checkout"))
     .to(CheckoutCreditCardProcessor.class);
         ^^^^^^^^

in here.

Comment by shonzilla, Sep 23, 2009

jchwastowska is right!

Is there any point in specifying a concrete type if the target instance's type is already determined using string value of @Named?

Could this be used as some sort of implicit fail-over mechanism in case there's nothing (instantiable) defined using string value of @Named?


Sign in to add a comment