Spring integration #47
Labels
Comments
|
From crazyboblee on February 28, 2007 12:53:24 The resulting configuration will look like this: bind(DataSource.class).toProvider(fromSpring(DataSource.class, "dataSource")); |
|
From kevinb9n on February 28, 2007 13:00:56 I'm fuzzy on the details, but the idea of making spring and guice share their stuff |
|
From crazyboblee on February 28, 2007 14:54:03 This should be pretty easy. Labels: 1.0RC3 |
|
From bileblog on February 28, 2007 16:18:50 This would definitely encourage adoption as it gives people an easy way to dip their toes into guice without |
|
From crazyboblee on March 02, 2007 16:24:10 (No comment was entered for this change.) Status: Fixed |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
From crazyboblee on February 28, 2007 15:51:22
Let's make Spring integration trival, so it's easy to share or migrate.
Here's how it will work:
The user must provide a binding to Spring's BeanFactory.
Then, we'll have the following class:
class SpringIntegration {
static <T> Provider<T> fromSpring(Class<T> type, String name) {
...
}
}
The returned provider will look up the Bean with the given name in the
bound BeanFactory.
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=47
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: