Define default scope for a series of bindings. #43
Labels
Comments
|
From kevinb9n on March 16, 2007 00:37:59 I'm not feelin the love on this one. It's just sugar. Adds more stuff to learn. I |
|
From crazyboblee on March 16, 2007 08:26:30 It can't hurt to at least lower the priority. Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low |
|
From kevinb9n on March 16, 2007 09:03:19 I'm not saying it's just an issue of priority but that it seems like a feature we |
|
From crazyboblee on March 16, 2007 10:28:06 I agree. I wanted to keep a bug around in case it comes up again, but I guess open or Status: WontFix |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
From crazyboblee on February 28, 2007 13:52:31
Something like this would be nice (we may have to wait for closures):
inScope(Scopes.SINGLETON) {
bind(...).to(...);
...
}
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=43
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: