We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From kevinb9n on February 27, 2007 01:58:35
Someone making such a binding seems like it could only lead to pain ("so much pain"). We should probably forbid it? Without breaking the unit tests.
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=32
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From crazyboblee on February 27, 2007 10:28:52
Works for me. We can always whitelist certain classes in the future, but we can't go the other way so this seem to be the safe choice.
Sorry, something went wrong.
From kevinb9n on February 28, 2007 15:08:32
tagging for the RC because it's easy enough
Labels: 1.0RC3
From crazyboblee on February 28, 2007 15:27:37
How did I miss this one? Definitely RC3.
From kevinb9n on February 28, 2007 18:15:39
fixed with revision 246 .
of course, the default bindings of Stage and Injector are still allowed.
Summary: Prohibit bindings to any com.google.inject.* type Status: Fixed
No branches or pull requests
From kevinb9n on February 27, 2007 01:58:35
Someone making such a binding seems like it could only lead to pain ("so
much pain"). We should probably forbid it? Without breaking the unit tests.
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=32
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: