Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Generalize dependencies instructions for non-Android #476

Closed
wonderfly opened this issue Jan 10, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Generalize dependencies instructions for non-Android #476

wonderfly opened this issue Jan 10, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees
@wonderfly
Labels
imported priority: p1 Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor

From yan...@google.com on April 19, 2012 08:09:50

External references, such as a standards document, or specification? https://code.google.com/p/google-oauth-java-client/issues/detail?id=33 https://code.google.com/p/google-api-java-client/wiki/Setup https://code.google.com/p/google-api-java-client/source/browse/google-api-client-assembly/readme.html http://mavenrepo.google-api-java-client.googlecode.com/hg/com/google/apis/google-api-services-plus/v1-rev4-1.5.0-beta/google-api-services-plus-v1-rev4-1.5.0-beta.zip Java environments (e.g. Java 6, Android 2.3, App Engine, or All)? All Please describe the feature requested. The details are mostly the same as the google-oauth-java-client issue linked above. One specific thing we should fix: we should remove the joda-time and jsontoken depedencies from the service-specific zip file.

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-api-java-client/issues/detail?id=461
@wonderfly wonderfly added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. imported 1 star priority: p1 Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release. labels Jan 10, 2015
@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on April 19, 2012 08:37:26

Actually there is something else about the service-specific zip file: since the generated model is JSON only, we may want to consider removing the dependencies for the other 2 formats: protobuf and xpp3

@wonderfly wonderfly self-assigned this Jan 10, 2015
@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on April 20, 2012 08:19:12

Never mind about the last comment about remove protobuf and xpp3: we need those for ProGuard.

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From rmis...@google.com on April 27, 2012 05:07:42

http://codereview.appspot.com/6127053

Status: Started

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From rmis...@google.com on May 01, 2012 05:12:50

Also added the list of platform dependencies to: https://code.google.com/p/google-api-java-client/wiki/Setup

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From rmis...@google.com on May 04, 2012 07:57:46

Lastly, updated readme.html in the generated libraries to include the list of platform dependencies.

Status: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wonderfly wonderfly

Labels
imported priority: p1 Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@wonderfly