My favorites | Sign in
Logo
Project Home
  
Downloads
  
Wiki
  
Issues
  
Source
    
Summary | Updates | People
Details: Show all Hide all

Last 7 days

Last 30 days

Earlier this year

  • Nov 20, 2009
    issue 84 (STICKY: Missing icons and feature requests) commented on by liquidator87   -   Just a suggestion... I liked the old "Battery State Applet" icon (the one that is now used into the System > Preferences > Power Management)...
    Just a suggestion... I liked the old "Battery State Applet" icon (the one that is now used into the System > Preferences > Power Management)...
  • Nov 14, 2009
    issue 127 (Black menus with Skype) commented on by pieskino   -   No i'm running a 32 bit version of Ubuntu Karmic.
    No i'm running a 32 bit version of Ubuntu Karmic.
  • Nov 14, 2009
    issue 127 (Black menus with Skype) commented on by german.layer8   -   You're probably running skype under 64bits. The same happen to me. In fact, newer QT libraries can use the GTK theme, but skype keep being a 32bits application. So, it detects the gtk config and colors but fails to load murrine (since it needs 32 bits murrine and the one installed is for 64bits).
    You're probably running skype under 64bits. The same happen to me. In fact, newer QT libraries can use the GTK theme, but skype keep being a 32bits application. So, it detects the gtk config and colors but fails to load murrine (since it needs 32 bits murrine and the one installed is for 64bits).
  • Nov 09, 2009
    issue 128 (Recognizable icon for Empathy) commented on by perfectska04   -   The purpose of using a generic icon is not to undermine the Telepathy framework, or what it stands for. I understand where you're coming from. However, a generic icon is used because this is an icon set, and there are other considerations involved. Most of the icons included do not refer to a single application, they are generic and this allows for future or current reusage with other applications similar in concept. That said, the generic Empathy icons are *only* included because Empathy does not currently have icons designed at all relevant sizes, with Tango/GNOME specifications. This makes their icon hard to recognize at smaller sizes, so an alternate icon was added here so that the application would be a little easier to recognize when using this particular icon set. Once upstream has had the chance to rebuild their icons properly, there will be no need to include Empathy icons with this icon set. I'm sorry if the decision makes you uncomfortable, but for icon sets - generic icons are usually the best way to go, even if sometimes branding is replaced. Empathy is not the only case, *many* applications are themed by gnome-colors with a simpler, more generic icon.
    The purpose of using a generic icon is not to undermine the Telepathy framework, or what it stands for. I understand where you're coming from. However, a generic icon is used because this is an icon set, and there are other considerations involved. Most of the icons included do not refer to a single application, they are generic and this allows for future or current reusage with other applications similar in concept. That said, the generic Empathy icons are *only* included because Empathy does not currently have icons designed at all relevant sizes, with Tango/GNOME specifications. This makes their icon hard to recognize at smaller sizes, so an alternate icon was added here so that the application would be a little easier to recognize when using this particular icon set. Once upstream has had the chance to rebuild their icons properly, there will be no need to include Empathy icons with this icon set. I'm sorry if the decision makes you uncomfortable, but for icon sets - generic icons are usually the best way to go, even if sometimes branding is replaced. Empathy is not the only case, *many* applications are themed by gnome-colors with a simpler, more generic icon.
  • Nov 09, 2009
    issue 128 (Recognizable icon for Empathy) commented on by jayr...@graffiti.net   -   I see you have your own concept of usability, but can you draw the Empathy icon so it scales well? Can you draw? Why an application that has its own branding (a good branding) and a whole framework behind be wrongfully identified as Kopete 4 or iChat? The connection you've explained is pretty poor and is unobvious, there is no usability in spite of the effort.
    I see you have your own concept of usability, but can you draw the Empathy icon so it scales well? Can you draw? Why an application that has its own branding (a good branding) and a whole framework behind be wrongfully identified as Kopete 4 or iChat? The connection you've explained is pretty poor and is unobvious, there is no usability in spite of the effort.
  • Nov 09, 2009
    issue 128 (Recognizable icon for Empathy) commented on by jayr...@graffiti.net   -   I see you have your own concept of usability, but can you draw the Empathy icon so it scales well? Can you draw? Why an application that has its own branding and a whole framework behind be wrongfully identified as Kopete 4 or iChat? The connection you've explained is pretty poor and is unobvious, there is no usability therefore.
    I see you have your own concept of usability, but can you draw the Empathy icon so it scales well? Can you draw? Why an application that has its own branding and a whole framework behind be wrongfully identified as Kopete 4 or iChat? The connection you've explained is pretty poor and is unobvious, there is no usability therefore.
  • Nov 08, 2009
    issue 128 (Recognizable icon for Empathy) changed by perfectska04   -   Empathy is a chat application, and the icon being used is merely a chat bubble with an exclamation. It is a generic metaphor that is easier to associate with a chat application than the original (a poorly scaled down representation of two faces?). The icon does not have its original logo, because a generic icon is easier to create and can also be reused with other similar applications in the future. In this case, the metaphor is clear, easy to recognize, and assuming there are no working linux ports of iChat - I doubt anyone could mix them up :).
    Status: Invalid
    Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low −Type-Defect −Priority-Medium
    Empathy is a chat application, and the icon being used is merely a chat bubble with an exclamation. It is a generic metaphor that is easier to associate with a chat application than the original (a poorly scaled down representation of two faces?). The icon does not have its original logo, because a generic icon is easier to create and can also be reused with other similar applications in the future. In this case, the metaphor is clear, easy to recognize, and assuming there are no working linux ports of iChat - I doubt anyone could mix them up :).
    Status: Invalid
    Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low −Type-Defect −Priority-Medium
  • Nov 08, 2009
    issue 128 (Recognizable icon for Empathy) reported by jayr...@graffiti.net   -   Hello. It's strange that the Empathy icon has nothing to deal with its real logo. It is easy to mix up with the icon of iChat. Maybe redraw the original or simply use it as it is? :) Thanks.
    Hello. It's strange that the Empathy icon has nothing to deal with its real logo. It is easy to mix up with the icon of iChat. Maybe redraw the original or simply use it as it is? :) Thanks.
  • Nov 03, 2009
    issue 127 (Black menus with Skype) commented on by Theo148   -   IIRC, Skype is built on Qt4 and not GTK - but that might have changed since I last checked.
    IIRC, Skype is built on Qt4 and not GTK - but that might have changed since I last checked.
  • Nov 03, 2009
    issue 127 (Black menus with Skype) Status changed by perfectska04   -   I will take a look whenever possible. I'm not aware if Skype uses native GTK rendering and libraries, so if not, that might cause an issue.
    Status: Accepted
    I will take a look whenever possible. I'm not aware if Skype uses native GTK rendering and libraries, so if not, that might cause an issue.
    Status: Accepted
  • Oct 30, 2009
    issue 125 ([Enhancement] New boot/login screen) commented on by perfectska04   -   As for xsplash, there is a new update that only uses one background file in backports repository. You can make said file a syslink to your current wallpaper and you'll always get your GDM/splash/Desktop in sync. Alternatively, you can make this file a completely black background and xsplash will appear as an extension to usplash until your desktop appears. However, your GDM will also have a static black background.
    As for xsplash, there is a new update that only uses one background file in backports repository. You can make said file a syslink to your current wallpaper and you'll always get your GDM/splash/Desktop in sync. Alternatively, you can make this file a completely black background and xsplash will appear as an extension to usplash until your desktop appears. However, your GDM will also have a static black background.
  • Oct 30, 2009
    issue 125 ([Enhancement] New boot/login screen) commented on by perfectska04   -   @mrbzzt If there's a particular matching I can add, it'd be easy to do so. However, I'm not sure where the bottom panel gets it's colors exactly... If it just uses the general window background color, there would be no way to incorporate it (other than just making a Shiki variant all dark, and solely for GDM). If anyone knows of a matching that can allow me to specify the text and background colors for the bottom GDM panel, I can add it to Shiki.
    @mrbzzt If there's a particular matching I can add, it'd be easy to do so. However, I'm not sure where the bottom panel gets it's colors exactly... If it just uses the general window background color, there would be no way to incorporate it (other than just making a Shiki variant all dark, and solely for GDM). If anyone knows of a matching that can allow me to specify the text and background colors for the bottom GDM panel, I can add it to Shiki.
  • Oct 30, 2009
    issue 125 ([Enhancement] New boot/login screen) commented on by mrbzzt   -   I just replaced the xsplash background images and made the logo files fully transparent. I hope that they somehow make it possible to create themes and switch these in the future. I've also been experimenting with the new login screen. It seems to be using normal GNOME themes and icon sets. The GNOME-Colors icons look quite good on it, but the Shiki-Colors theme does not like the panel-like bar at the bottom. Only the shutdown menu button in the bottom right corner gets themed as a panel. I wonder if it would be possible to alter the theme to treat the whole bar as a panel. You can try it yourself by entering these commands in in a terminal (And then logging out): sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /apps/metacity/general/theme Shiki-Colors-Metacity sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /desktop/gnome/interface/gtk_theme Shiki-Brave sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /desktop/gnome/interface/icon_theme GNOME-Brave To reset to Ubuntu default: sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /apps/metacity/general/theme HumanLogin sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /desktop/gnome/interface/gtk_theme HumanLogin sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /desktop/gnome/interface/icon_theme HumanLoginIcons
    I just replaced the xsplash background images and made the logo files fully transparent. I hope that they somehow make it possible to create themes and switch these in the future. I've also been experimenting with the new login screen. It seems to be using normal GNOME themes and icon sets. The GNOME-Colors icons look quite good on it, but the Shiki-Colors theme does not like the panel-like bar at the bottom. Only the shutdown menu button in the bottom right corner gets themed as a panel. I wonder if it would be possible to alter the theme to treat the whole bar as a panel. You can try it yourself by entering these commands in in a terminal (And then logging out): sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /apps/metacity/general/theme Shiki-Colors-Metacity sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /desktop/gnome/interface/gtk_theme Shiki-Brave sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /desktop/gnome/interface/icon_theme GNOME-Brave To reset to Ubuntu default: sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /apps/metacity/general/theme HumanLogin sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /desktop/gnome/interface/gtk_theme HumanLogin sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 -t string -s /desktop/gnome/interface/icon_theme HumanLoginIcons
  • Oct 30, 2009
    issue 127 (Black menus with Skype) reported by pieskino   -   What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Load Skype; 2. Right click on its application bar icon, or just the options menu on its window; 3. Look at black background of the options list. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Black menu, expected white or almost more visible one. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? 2.1.0.47, from medibuntu repository.
    What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Load Skype; 2. Right click on its application bar icon, or just the options menu on its window; 3. Look at black background of the options list. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Black menu, expected white or almost more visible one. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? 2.1.0.47, from medibuntu repository.
  • Oct 28, 2009
    r282 (Tag gnome-colors for release.) committed by perfectska04   -   Tag gnome-colors for release.
    Tag gnome-colors for release.
  • Oct 28, 2009
    extra-gnome-colors-icons-20.tar.gz (Extras for GNOME-Colors icons) file uploaded by perfectska04   -  
    Labels: OpSys-Linux Type-Archive
    Labels: OpSys-Linux Type-Archive
  • Oct 28, 2009
    gnome-colors-extras-5.5.1.tar.gz (GNOME-Colors extra icon themes, 5.5.1) file uploaded by perfectska04   -  
    Labels: OpSys-Linux Type-Archive Featured
    Labels: OpSys-Linux Type-Archive Featured
  • Oct 28, 2009
    gnome-colors-src-5.5.1.tar.gz (GNOME-Colors Source Pack 5.5.1 (For custom icon theme creati...) file uploaded by perfectska04   -  
    Labels: OpSys-Linux Type-Source
    Labels: OpSys-Linux Type-Source
  • Oct 28, 2009
    gnome-colors-5.5.1.tar.gz (GNOME-Colors icon themes, 5.5.1) file uploaded by perfectska04   -  
    Labels: OpSys-Linux Type-Archive Featured
    Labels: OpSys-Linux Type-Archive Featured
  • Oct 28, 2009
    r281 (Add links for more xdg-folder icons.) committed by perfectska04   -   Add links for more xdg-folder icons.
    Add links for more xdg-folder icons.
  • Oct 28, 2009
    r280 (Update ChangeLog, remove unneeded Transmission icon.) committed by perfectska04   -   Update ChangeLog, remove unneeded Transmission icon.
    Update ChangeLog, remove unneeded Transmission icon.
  • Oct 27, 2009
    issue 125 ([Enhancement] New boot/login screen) commented on by perfectska04   -   xplash currently only uses images found in /usr/share/images/xsplash You could change the background and animations as you wish, but this would not be reversible - unless you backed up the original backgrounds. I imagine you can also modify the animations, as they are images as well. This, however would be more tricky and require more knowledge and some means of creating the new animations with GIMP or Inkscape. For now, Karmic users are stuck with the stock xplash and they cannot modify it without replacing this images. Perhaps in the next release more configuration will be available?
    xplash currently only uses images found in /usr/share/images/xsplash You could change the background and animations as you wish, but this would not be reversible - unless you backed up the original backgrounds. I imagine you can also modify the animations, as they are images as well. This, however would be more tricky and require more knowledge and some means of creating the new animations with GIMP or Inkscape. For now, Karmic users are stuck with the stock xplash and they cannot modify it without replacing this images. Perhaps in the next release more configuration will be available?
  • Oct 27, 2009
    issue 126 ([Enhancement] Shiki&Colors theme for Chrome) changed by perfectska04   -   Don't worry, they've hidden the preference rather well, so it's understandable. The newest release of Shiki-Colors supports this option properly, and you can also click on the titlebar and select native window borders if you'd like to use the Shiki-Colors window border instead of Chromium's.
    Status: Invalid
    Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low −Type-Defect −Priority-Medium
    Don't worry, they've hidden the preference rather well, so it's understandable. The newest release of Shiki-Colors supports this option properly, and you can also click on the titlebar and select native window borders if you'd like to use the Shiki-Colors window border instead of Chromium's.
    Status: Invalid
    Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low −Type-Defect −Priority-Medium
  • Oct 27, 2009
    issue 125 ([Enhancement] New boot/login screen) commented on by abirkel   -   I remember seeing a whole bunch of different suggestions for the Karmic boot-up screen, would these all have had to been individually programmed into xsplash in some difficult-to-do manner?
    I remember seeing a whole bunch of different suggestions for the Karmic boot-up screen, would these all have had to been individually programmed into xsplash in some difficult-to-do manner?
  • Oct 27, 2009
    issue 126 ([Enhancement] Shiki&Colors theme for Chrome) commented on by abirkel   -   I withdraw this comment. I updated Chrome again and now there is an option to use the GTK+ theme (inside of Chrome). Glad they added this. Sorry!
    I withdraw this comment. I updated Chrome again and now there is an option to use the GTK+ theme (inside of Chrome). Glad they added this. Sorry!
  • Oct 27, 2009
    issue 125 ([Enhancement] New boot/login screen) changed by perfectska04   -   There is currently no graphical way to configure xsplash. In fact, the only way to make changes to it is to physically alter it's image files found in /usr/share/images/xsplash. Due to this, there's no way for me to create a theme for xsplash - as it would be destructive. If you want to personally modify it, you can go to that folder as administrator and replace the provided backgrounds with your own, effectively changing the xsplash appearance.
    Status: Invalid
    Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low −Type-Defect −Priority-Medium
    There is currently no graphical way to configure xsplash. In fact, the only way to make changes to it is to physically alter it's image files found in /usr/share/images/xsplash. Due to this, there's no way for me to create a theme for xsplash - as it would be destructive. If you want to personally modify it, you can go to that folder as administrator and replace the provided backgrounds with your own, effectively changing the xsplash appearance.
    Status: Invalid
    Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low −Type-Defect −Priority-Medium
  • Oct 27, 2009
    issue 126 ([Enhancement] Shiki&Colors theme for Chrome) reported by abirkel   -   Now that Google Chrome is getting quite mature on Linux and also supports Themes, it would be wonderful to see a Shiki theme with the various colors highlights. (You can even use greasemonkey scripts in Chrome now!)
    Now that Google Chrome is getting quite mature on Linux and also supports Themes, it would be wonderful to see a Shiki theme with the various colors highlights. (You can even use greasemonkey scripts in Chrome now!)
  • Oct 27, 2009
    issue 125 ([Enhancement] New boot/login screen) reported by abirkel   -   *-COLORS boot-screen/login-screen for the new Karmic replacement for usplash (whatever it is called, I can't think of it off hand)
    *-COLORS boot-screen/login-screen for the new Karmic replacement for usplash (whatever it is called, I can't think of it off hand)
  • Oct 26, 2009
    issue 84 (STICKY: Missing icons and feature requests) commented on by perfectska04   -   Oh, as a workaround. If you REALLY want monochrome icons on gnome-colors, all you have to do is: 1. Make a copy of the Humanity-Dark folder in /usr/share/icons and rename it to something like "gnome-brave-dark" (or desired color) 2. Open the folder's index.theme file in a text editor, and replace "Inherits=Humanity" to "Inherits=gnome-brave". 3. Replace the "Name=Humanity-Dark" to "Name=Gnome-Brave-Dark". 4. Update icon cache: sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-brave-dark 5. Select the new icon set in Appearance Preferences. This will give you monochrome tray icons without breaking anything. However, you will only be able to do this for the light monochrome icons, so they will only be visible on dark themes such as Shiki-Colors or Dust.
    Oh, as a workaround. If you REALLY want monochrome icons on gnome-colors, all you have to do is: 1. Make a copy of the Humanity-Dark folder in /usr/share/icons and rename it to something like "gnome-brave-dark" (or desired color) 2. Open the folder's index.theme file in a text editor, and replace "Inherits=Humanity" to "Inherits=gnome-brave". 3. Replace the "Name=Humanity-Dark" to "Name=Gnome-Brave-Dark". 4. Update icon cache: sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-brave-dark 5. Select the new icon set in Appearance Preferences. This will give you monochrome tray icons without breaking anything. However, you will only be able to do this for the light monochrome icons, so they will only be visible on dark themes such as Shiki-Colors or Dust.
  • Oct 26, 2009
    issue 84 (STICKY: Missing icons and feature requests) commented on by perfectska04   -   @nate8nate8 The connecting animation would take a great deal of space and icons, even though it'd be just seen once. I doubt it'll get replaced, might be a better idea to create nicer tango-based icons and submit upstream to the network-manager application. @andrey@sitnik.ru The problem is that monochrome icons can't be visible with all themes. You can have light icons that will only be visible on dark themes, or dark icons that will only be visible with light themes. There'd have to be two variations of each theme (considering gnome-colors ships 7 icon sets, we'd have 14 just to add a few tray icons), and even then - it'd be rather inconvenient to have to switch between icon sets just because you're trying out a different GTK theme. Ubuntu's icons can get away with it, because they only have one icon set. You can select either a dark or a light version for that one icon set. GNOME-Colors has 7, making two variations of every single one would be impractical.
    @nate8nate8 The connecting animation would take a great deal of space and icons, even though it'd be just seen once. I doubt it'll get replaced, might be a better idea to create nicer tango-based icons and submit upstream to the network-manager application. @andrey@sitnik.ru The problem is that monochrome icons can't be visible with all themes. You can have light icons that will only be visible on dark themes, or dark icons that will only be visible with light themes. There'd have to be two variations of each theme (considering gnome-colors ships 7 icon sets, we'd have 14 just to add a few tray icons), and even then - it'd be rather inconvenient to have to switch between icon sets just because you're trying out a different GTK theme. Ubuntu's icons can get away with it, because they only have one icon set. You can select either a dark or a light version for that one icon set. GNOME-Colors has 7, making two variations of every single one would be impractical.
  • Oct 26, 2009
    issue 84 (STICKY: Missing icons and feature requests) commented on by and...@sitnik.ru   -   Hi, thanks for your cool art, but in Karmic I saw amazing thing: monochrome icons in tray. It really usable because tray is background information and should not distract. I know that many tray icons from third part apps if colors (Transmission, etc) but I think it is good to be a standard.
    Hi, thanks for your cool art, but in Karmic I saw amazing thing: monochrome icons in tray. It really usable because tray is background information and should not distract. I know that many tray icons from third part apps if colors (Transmission, etc) but I think it is good to be a standard.
  • Oct 21, 2009
    issue 122 (gnome 2.28 and system tray) Status changed by perfectska04   -   Thanks for filing the bug. I'll mark it as invalid, as it appears to be specific to another Arch package and not the theme itself, as I've not been able to reproduce it and it affects many other themes. Feel free to comment further if the bug is resolved, or if anyone mentions a possible workaround that can be applied from this end.
    Status: Invalid
    Thanks for filing the bug. I'll mark it as invalid, as it appears to be specific to another Arch package and not the theme itself, as I've not been able to reproduce it and it affects many other themes. Feel free to comment further if the bug is resolved, or if anyone mentions a possible workaround that can be applied from this end.
    Status: Invalid
  • Oct 21, 2009
    issue 117 (Black trowel in Ubuntu Software Store) Status changed by perfectska04   -   I'm marking this as invalid. The icon itself renders fine elsewhere, it appears to be a sofware-center bug, and after reading a related bug - it appears to happen due to poor webkit svg rendering. The related bug that mentions this issue is this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/437431 Note that this happens as well with the default icon set for Ubuntu Karmic, so it is not specific to gnome-colors.
    Status: Invalid
    I'm marking this as invalid. The icon itself renders fine elsewhere, it appears to be a sofware-center bug, and after reading a related bug - it appears to happen due to poor webkit svg rendering. The related bug that mentions this issue is this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/437431 Note that this happens as well with the default icon set for Ubuntu Karmic, so it is not specific to gnome-colors.
    Status: Invalid
  • Oct 19, 2009
    issue 12 (Icon 'multimedia-player-ipod-video-black' not present in the...) commented on by paolo.ariano   -   same error as described in the 1st post: "Icon 'multimedia-player-ipod-nano-blue' not present in theme" at Gtk.IconTheme.LoadIcon (System.String icon_name, Int32 size, IconLookupFlags flags) [0x00000] at Hipo.HipoMainWindow.GetDeviceIcon (IPod.Device device) [0x00000] at Hipo.PlaylistView+<AddDeviceToStore>c__AnonStorey3.<>m__3 (System.Object , System.EventArgs ) [0x00000] at Gtk.Application+InvokeCB.Invoke () [0x00000] at GLib.Timeout+TimeoutProxy.Handler () [0x00000] installed Tango theme on debian but nothing changed :(
    same error as described in the 1st post: "Icon 'multimedia-player-ipod-nano-blue' not present in theme" at Gtk.IconTheme.LoadIcon (System.String icon_name, Int32 size, IconLookupFlags flags) [0x00000] at Hipo.HipoMainWindow.GetDeviceIcon (IPod.Device device) [0x00000] at Hipo.PlaylistView+<AddDeviceToStore>c__AnonStorey3.<>m__3 (System.Object , System.EventArgs ) [0x00000] at Gtk.Application+InvokeCB.Invoke () [0x00000] at GLib.Timeout+TimeoutProxy.Handler () [0x00000] installed Tango theme on debian but nothing changed :(
  • Oct 18, 2009
    r279 (Add new Empathy icons.) committed by perfectska04   -   Add new Empathy icons.
    Add new Empathy icons.
  • Oct 18, 2009
    r278 (Add gtk-dialog-warning-panel syslink for Karmic.) committed by perfectska04   -   Add gtk-dialog-warning-panel syslink for Karmic.
    Add gtk-dialog-warning-panel syslink for Karmic.
  • Oct 18, 2009
    r277 (Update icons.) committed by perfectska04   -   Update icons.
    Update icons.
  • Oct 18, 2009
    r276 (Add syslinks.) committed by perfectska04   -   Add syslinks.
    Add syslinks.
  • Oct 18, 2009
    issue 122 (gnome 2.28 and system tray) commented on by venator85   -   Could be, I opened this bug: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16726 Thanks ;)
    Could be, I opened this bug: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16726 Thanks ;)
  • Oct 18, 2009
    r275 (Remove icons to add syslinks instead.) committed by perfectska04   -   Remove icons to add syslinks instead.
    Remove icons to add syslinks instead.
  • Oct 18, 2009
    r274 (Remove unneeded icons.) committed by perfectska04   -   Remove unneeded icons.
    Remove unneeded icons.
  • Oct 18, 2009
    issue 122 (gnome 2.28 and system tray) commented on by perfectska04   -   Update: I just installed both Sonata and Gajim, yet the tray icons seem to all work as intended. This is on Ubuntu's GNOME 2.28. Perhaps there's an affected package in Arch that is causing this issue?
    Update: I just installed both Sonata and Gajim, yet the tray icons seem to all work as intended. This is on Ubuntu's GNOME 2.28. Perhaps there's an affected package in Arch that is causing this issue?
  • Oct 18, 2009
    issue 122 (gnome 2.28 and system tray) commented on by perfectska04   -   If New Wave shows the same, then there are two possible reasons: 1. It's a gnome-panel/GTK 2.18 issue. 2. A new type of matching has been implemented, and those specific applications use it. If this is the case, it can probably be fixed - but there's no way for me to know which matching rule is being used. Am I correct in guessing that the applications suffering from this the most are sonata and gajim? If so, I'll install them and try various wildcard panel matchings and see if one works.
    If New Wave shows the same, then there are two possible reasons: 1. It's a gnome-panel/GTK 2.18 issue. 2. A new type of matching has been implemented, and those specific applications use it. If this is the case, it can probably be fixed - but there's no way for me to know which matching rule is being used. Am I correct in guessing that the applications suffering from this the most are sonata and gajim? If so, I'll install them and try various wildcard panel matchings and see if one works.
  • Oct 18, 2009
    issue 122 (gnome 2.28 and system tray) commented on by venator85   -   New Wave shows the same defect. Maybe GTK 2.18 are responsible of this.
    New Wave shows the same defect. Maybe GTK 2.18 are responsible of this.
  • Oct 18, 2009
    issue 122 (gnome 2.28 and system tray) commented on by perfectska04   -   If the issue is also available in Dust, then it might be application related or due to changes in gnome-panel. To confirm this, can you try testing with the "New Wave" theme? It generally has looser panel matching options, so if it also fails at drawing the correct background - the issue might be elsewhere. If the background does appear with "New Wave", then Shiki can be made to use looser matching types in order to fix the issue.
    If the issue is also available in Dust, then it might be application related or due to changes in gnome-panel. To confirm this, can you try testing with the "New Wave" theme? It generally has looser panel matching options, so if it also fails at drawing the correct background - the issue might be elsewhere. If the background does appear with "New Wave", then Shiki can be made to use looser matching types in order to fix the issue.
  • Oct 18, 2009
    issue 122 (gnome 2.28 and system tray) commented on by venator85   -   Updating to shiki colors 4.6 didn't solve the issue.
    Updating to shiki colors 4.6 didn't solve the issue.
 
Hosted by Google Code