| Issue 23: | Feature: BibTeX support | |
| 3 people starred this issue and may be notified of changes. | Back to list |
I suggest that some pages, or delimited parts of pages, could be written in BibTeX. Gitit could then run BibTeX over the references in order to convert them to HTML. This would have a couple of benefits: * A wide variety of bibliography management software (Zotero, CiteULike, etc.) can export to BibTeX. * The display style of academic references could be customised and made uniform (per reference type) across the wiki, using existing BibTeX styles and BibTeX style generation software. |
|
,
Feb 05, 2009
The best way to do this would be to use the experimental pandoc support for Andrea Rossato's hs-citeproc. This would allow citations to be written in a markdownish format and exported not just to HTML but to all of pandoc's output formats. hs-citeproc also has bindings to bibutils, which allows it to read bibliographies in many different formats. For details, see http://code.haskell.org/citeproc-hs/.
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement
|
|
,
Feb 11, 2009
So, John, what would adding support for hs-citeproc mean from the standpoint of gitit? I presume you'd need to make a few tweaks to enable this? |
|
,
Feb 11, 2009
The main bit of work is figuring out how to specify a bibliography file. If the file is xml or bibtex, it could just live in the repository as an uploaded file (though this would make it visible in the wiki - perhaps that's not always desirable). But there would still need to be some convention for specifying which bibliography to use for a given page. Ideas welcome. |
|
,
Feb 12, 2009
I guess the best balance of ease of implementation and use and generality is to have a single global bibliography file, which could optionally be marked private? I could imagine some useful UI stuff could later be built on top of that using Javascript. BTW, might be nice if Andrea can at some point add optional RDFa support, so that the HTML content can be tagged for easy extraction. |
|
|
|