Navigation Menu

Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 16, 2022. It is now read-only.

iOS Build Settings Look to be Backwards for GDataTouchStaticLib #74

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 21, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
<Using top of trunk from SVN as of Sep 22>
1. Select GData.xcodeproj
2. Open Target
3. Select GDataTouchStaticLib
4. Review settings:
Base SDK: iPhoneOS 3
iOS Deployment Target: iOS 4.2

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

The settings are backwards, per Apple's extensive badgering on this issue.
Base SDK should be set to the latest SDK possible that the application will 
work against, in this case iOS Device 4.2.

iOS Deployment Target should be set to the oldest iOS version that the software 
can be deployed on, in this case iOS 3.0.

This is lightly documented in the comments at the bottom of the Build page, but 
is covered extensively in Apple's Effective iPhone App Development (Part 1) 
video from their Advanced Videos on iTunes U.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

I am using it against XCode 3.2.4 and compiling for iOS 4.1 compatibility.


Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by barney.m...@gmail.com on 23 Sep 2010 at 5:41

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Additionally, if you want to support back to 3.0, I believe the Architectures 
build setting needs to be set for Standard (arm6 arm7).  This is not set for 
all of the build configurations which may generate an error for some people 
depending on their setup.

Original comment by barney.m...@gmail.com on 23 Sep 2010 at 5:50

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Some of what you're seeing is just due to the SDKs you have installed. There's 
too great a variety of SDKs in use currently, and the project checked in is not 
always updated for the latest. You'll need to put in target settings 
appropriate for your application.

Original comment by gregrobbins on 23 Sep 2010 at 7:43

  • Changed state: Accepted

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants