Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support resource costs with per hour and flat rates #206

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jun 28, 2015 · 13 comments
Closed

Support resource costs with per hour and flat rates #206

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jun 28, 2015 · 13 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

some contractors bid their jobs in terms of a flat fee.  
some in terms of an hourly wage in units/hr and is measured in hours and days 
and workweeks and years (different time units, this is not a detailed list) and 
a wage per hr or month or bi-weekly or weekly.
I don't know if there are any other methods.
but a generic unit only is not sufficient to calculate the cost of a job: the 
reason is that you can't force these 2 different types of items into one flat 
dimensionless number without spending a lot of time doing hand calculations.
and isn't that one of the things a project management tool is supposed to 
eliminate?  job costing?
a price per hour and number of hours or flat rate of a resource

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jmich...@yahoo.com on 8 Mar 2011 at 11:02

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Renamed because resource cost is not supported in GanttProject in any form, and 
units mean a fraction of time devoted to some task. "Cost rather than time" 
thus doesn't make too much sense.

Original comment by dbarashev on 8 Mar 2011 at 11:43

  • Changed title: Support resource costs with per hour and flat rates
  • Changed state: Accepted
  • Added labels: Cost, Resources

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

[deleted comment]

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

you guys can do whatever you want, I have given up hope for this project being 
useful.  if I need project management, I know one place to go: Microsoft 
Project. it works and it works well, though it is expensive.

Original comment by jmich...@yahoo.com on 9 Apr 2012 at 9:03

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Please this wold be nice. 
this is related to issue 142.

Original comment by nikolaio...@gmail.com on 17 Apr 2012 at 4:40

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I agree. It would make the program much more useful if one can do cost estimate 
based on each resource's assigned work hours and flat charging rate.

Original comment by FEA.ME...@gmail.com on 11 Oct 2012 at 7:22

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I think the program is working very nicely and does a lot of stuff that puts 
microsoft project aside. The ability to do cost estimation as a built in 
function would upgrade the application very much.

Original comment by siry...@gmail.com on 20 Nov 2012 at 6:54

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I love this product and I use it! 
But....
Cost Estimation,obtained simply multiplying hours of devoted time to a task by 
a fixed hourly fee set for each resource.
This would really be a big leap forward.

Original comment by fr...@arsilicii.com on 10 Apr 2013 at 1:36

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Cost estimation would be a great enhancement to an already very useful tool.
In addition if the cost could split into categories that would be the icing on 
the cake.

Original comment by acco...@gmail.com on 3 Sep 2013 at 3:52

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This would be the best if costings could be integrated. I would be using this 
as my main program if it could.

Original comment by jack.eri...@gmail.com on 9 Jan 2014 at 5:09

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Yes, this would be very helpful.
If in the meantime, I could recommend:
one could set for a task/resource combination a value and an amount of how this 
person for this task will be paid (example month 1.000 usd) and then export to 
csv a report with this info then the rest of calculations can be done in Excel. 
This could be a "simple" way of helping the users (me one of them) have a head 
start on the costing part.

Thanks for the application and your efforts.

Original comment by sol...@gmail.com on 26 Mar 2014 at 5:16

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Beta builds of GP 2.7 provide simple task cost calculation with per-day 
resource rates.

Original comment by dbaras...@ganttproject.biz on 18 Nov 2014 at 12:51

  • Changed state: FeelFreeToTest

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by dbarashev on 22 Jan 2015 at 4:59

  • Added labels: __Target-Ostrava

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Closing all tickets with status "FeelFreeToTest". Feel free to reopen if the 
issue is still reproducible.

Original comment by dbaras...@ganttproject.biz on 18 Mar 2015 at 3:39

  • Changed state: Verified

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant