You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To remain compatible with v. 2 Readers, the dc:language requirement remains
restricted to rfc 5646 (a successor of 3306).
There is an opportunity to loosen the restriction for the dcterms:language
property. Addition, of ISO 639-* codes could facilitate some bibliographic
identifiers not covered by RFC 5646.
Issues:
- openness v. predictability;
- need to clarify why property is looser than element and why any specific
additional codes are being added;
- need to ensure consistency of language expression between the element and
property if different codes are used.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by mgarrish on 12 Feb 2011 at 6:38
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue predates the 20110215 working draft, which included a specification
of values for dcterms/dc language. No comments have been received that that
specification was lacking or too restrictive.
Original comment by markus.g...@gmail.com on 7 Apr 2011 at 7:35
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mgarrish
on 12 Feb 2011 at 6:38The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: