Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dc:language restriction #77

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

dc:language restriction #77

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels
Priority-Low Spec-OPF The issue affects the OPF 2.0.1 specification (not maintained)

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

To remain compatible with v. 2 Readers, the dc:language requirement remains 
restricted to rfc 5646 (a successor of 3306).

There is an opportunity to loosen the restriction for the dcterms:language 
property. Addition, of ISO 639-* codes could facilitate some bibliographic 
identifiers not covered by RFC 5646.

Issues:
- openness v. predictability;
- need to clarify why property is looser than element and why any specific 
additional codes are being added;
- need to ensure consistency of language expression between the element and 
property if different codes are used.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by mgarrish on 12 Feb 2011 at 6:38

@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter added auto-migrated Spec-OPF The issue affects the OPF 2.0.1 specification (not maintained) Priority-Low labels Mar 24, 2015
@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This issue predates the 20110215 working draft, which included a specification 
of values for dcterms/dc language. No comments have been received that that 
specification was lacking or too restrictive. 

Original comment by markus.g...@gmail.com on 7 Apr 2011 at 7:35

  • Changed state: WontFix

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority-Low Spec-OPF The issue affects the OPF 2.0.1 specification (not maintained)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant