Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

section #47

Closed
tucotuco opened this issue Nov 13, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

section #47

tucotuco opened this issue Nov 13, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member

Was https://code.google.com/p/darwincore/issues/detail?id=149

==New Term Recommendation==
Submitter: David Remsen

Justification: In botany, sections are typically used to help organise very large genera, which may have hundreds of species.[1] A botanist wanting to distinguish groups of species may prefer to create a taxon at the rank of section or series to avoid making new combinations

Definition: "The full scientific name of the section in which the taxon is classified."

Comment: Examples: "Anthurium sect. Gymnopodium", "Rhododendron sect. Pentanthera"

Refines: http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/family

Has Domain: http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm#Taxon

Has Range:

Replaces:

ABCD 2.06:

Mar 9, 2012 comment #1 dpremsen
I know I introduced this term but I suppose that it could arguably be covered by including it in the dwc:scientificName.

Mar 9, 2012 comment #3 dpremsen
Would like to amend the definition ""The full scientific name of the (botanical) section in which the taxon is classified. In botany, the section falls below genus but above species. The subgenus, if present, is higher than the section."

Oct 3, 2013 comment #8 gtuco.btuco
I would like to promote the adoption of the concept mentioned in this issue. To do so, I will need a stronger proposal demonstrating the need to share this information - that is, that independent groups, organizations, projects have the same need and can reach a consensus proposal about how the term should be used. It might be a good idea to circulate the proposal on tdwg-content and see if a community can be built around and support the addition.

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member

This proposal needs more evidence for demand (see the Vocabulary Maintenance Specification - Section 3.1). Anybody who is interested in the adoption/change of this term, should comment with their use case below. If demand is not demonstrated by the next annual review of open proposals (late 2020), this proposal will be dismissed.

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member Author

Closing for lack of demand.

@mdoering mdoering added this to the Taxon ranks milestone Nov 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants