dcterms:language recommended vocab, update needed #136
Assignees
Comments
|
This seems sensible. As far as I can tell, from a superficial reading, this
will not make any difference to the majority of users.
Regards
Quentin
Dr. Quentin Groom
(Botany and Information Technology)
Botanic Garden Meise
Domein van Bouchout
B-1860 Meise
Belgium
ORCID: 0000-0002-0596-5376 <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0596-5376>
Landline; +32 (0) 226 009 20 ext. 364
FAX: +32 (0) 226 009 45
E-mail: quentin.groom@plantentuinmeise.be
Skype name: qgroom
Website: www.botanicgarden.be
…On 28 February 2017 at 00:40, Paula Zermoglio ***@***.***> wrote:
dcterms:language <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm#dcterms:language>
is currently recommended to use RFC 4646 as controlled vocabulary. RFC 4646
has been deprecated, 5646 being the current one.
Recommendation should be updated to point to RFC 5646.
RFC 4646: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4646
RFC 5646: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5646
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#136>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFRj0F6YhJrsCE3B5k6_kd5EFUgEYUzqks5rg1DAgaJpZM4MNuVA>
.
|
|
Makes sense! |
|
Amended in 70d7a9f. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
dcterms:language is currently recommended to use RFC 4646 as controlled vocabulary. RFC 4646 has been deprecated, 5646 being the current one.
Recommendation should be updated to point to RFC 5646.
RFC 4646: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4646
RFC 5646: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5646
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: