Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

What term to use for invasive species management information? #104

Closed
peterdesmet opened this issue Aug 7, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

What term to use for invasive species management information? #104

peterdesmet opened this issue Aug 7, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels
Question - open

Comments

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member

We're in the process of publishing an invasive species occurrence dataset. For a lot of occurrences, management actions were undertaken, i.e. the animal/plant/egg was killed and/or removed from its location. It is important that we can publish this information (ideally in a standardized way), as it will be used for reports.

What would be a good term to describe this? samplingProtocol, occurrenceRemarks, new term managementAction? What is the Invasive Species Interest Group advising/using for this information?
@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member Author

Pinging @DimEvil, as he's actually the author of this question.

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member

tucotuco commented Dec 3, 2015

Though the term name does not reflect well what you are trying to cover, and there has been some debate about it, establishmentMeans is supposed to capture the invasiveness aspect. samplingProtocol is flexible enough that it could take care of the rest. occurrenceRemarks would be a good place for the information to get lost.

@tucotuco tucotuco closed this as completed Dec 3, 2015
@peterdesmet peterdesmet mentioned this issue Dec 8, 2015
Open
22 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Question - open
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tucotuco @peterdesmet