You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Possibly a Dartium 33 regression? We don't get stack traces with the 'Console.messageAdded' events. Or we do, but they don't have valid information. The url and functionName fields are 'undefined'.
I believe this got broken in the Chrome 32 merge.
asiva recently tweaked the code so at least we get a significant performance win by not showing the source location. Previously you could only send ~1000 console messages a second.
OK, I verified that we see the same thing in the devtools console.
For the editor, the most valuable information is the top frame - the location where the print() call occurred. If we can get most of the performance benefit by only reporting the top frame in the stack trace, that would be great. I.e., not reporting the other n-1 frames.
Possibly a Dartium 33 regression? We don't get stack traces with the 'Console.messageAdded' events. Or we do, but they don't have valid information. The url and functionName fields are 'undefined'.
"stackTrace":[{"lineNumber":0,"scriptId":"","functionName":"undefined","columnNumber":0,"url":"undefined"}]
We had been seeing correct information in earlier builds (definitely in Dartium 31; not sure about 32).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: