Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark inherited methods differently in the minimap #16365

Closed
alan-knight opened this issue Jan 28, 2014 · 8 comments
Closed

Mark inherited methods differently in the minimap #16365

alan-knight opened this issue Jan 28, 2014 · 8 comments

Comments

@alan-knight
Copy link
Contributor

It would be helpful if inherited methods in the minimap were somehow distinct from methods implemented directly in the class.

@anders-sandholm
Copy link
Contributor

Removed Area-DartDocNext label.
Added Area-DartDoc label.

@alan-knight
Copy link
Contributor Author

Issue #16517 has been merged into this issue.

@DartBot
Copy link

DartBot commented Feb 14, 2014

This comment was originally written by @tatumizer


There's one subtle point about inherited methods. Actually, I'm not sure what "inherited" means. E.g. methods like == or toString() are never marked as inherited, and their description is fully copied from Object just everywhere.

@kevmoo
Copy link
Member

kevmoo commented Mar 17, 2014

Added Pkg-DartDoc label.

@kevmoo
Copy link
Member

kevmoo commented Mar 17, 2014

Removed Area-DartDoc label.
Added Area-Pkg label.

@kevmoo
Copy link
Member

kevmoo commented Apr 7, 2014

Removed Area-Pkg label.
Added Area-DartDocViewer label.

@kevmoo
Copy link
Member

kevmoo commented Apr 7, 2014

Removed Pkg-DartDoc label.

@nicolasgarnier
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been moved to Github as part of a migration. Please use the Issue on Github going forward: https://github.com/dart-lang/dartdoc-viewer/issues


Added MovedToGithub label.

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants