Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Produce an official OpenShift cartridge for Dart #16235

Closed
schultzter opened this issue Jan 21, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

Produce an official OpenShift cartridge for Dart #16235

schultzter opened this issue Jan 21, 2014 · 2 comments
Labels
closed-not-planned Closed as we don't intend to take action on the reported issue type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug

Comments

@schultzter
Copy link

OpenShift is a great PaaS and while we wait for Google's AppEngine to support Dart it would be really cool if you provided an official OpenShift cartridge rather than have us rely on under-resourced 3rd parties or everyone rolling their own.

I speak from personal experience since I'm now stuck maintaining an AUR package I no longer use but I don't want to abandon either and leave the community hanging.

@lrhn
Copy link
Member

lrhn commented Jan 22, 2014

Removed Type-Defect label.
Added Type-Enhancement, Area-Tools, Triaged labels.

@mit-mit
Copy link
Member

mit-mit commented Sep 1, 2015

Closing as NotPlanned, for current server options please see https://www.dartlang.org/server/

@mit-mit mit-mit closed this as completed Sep 1, 2015
@mit-mit mit-mit added closed-not-planned Closed as we don't intend to take action on the reported issue and removed Area-Tools labels Sep 1, 2015
@kevmoo kevmoo added type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug and removed triaged labels Mar 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closed-not-planned Closed as we don't intend to take action on the reported issue type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants