Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uri resolve method that detects abnormal examples #13196

Open
DartBot opened this issue Sep 10, 2013 · 1 comment
Open

Uri resolve method that detects abnormal examples #13196

DartBot opened this issue Sep 10, 2013 · 1 comment
Labels
area-core-library SDK core library issues (core, async, ...); use area-vm or area-web for platform specific libraries. core-n type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug

Comments

@DartBot
Copy link

DartBot commented Sep 10, 2013

This issue was originally filed by bsles...@gmail.com


Uri.resolve() implements RFC 3986 which says to treat "abnormal examples" [1] like this:

"../../../g" = "http://a/g"

It would be nice to have a way to detect bad URL's that look like this for reporting errors. Maybe: uri.resolvesAbnormally(base).

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-5.4.2

@dgrove
Copy link
Contributor

dgrove commented Sep 11, 2013

Removed Type-Defect label.
Added Type-Enhancement, Area-Library, Triaged labels.

@DartBot DartBot added Type-Enhancement area-core-library SDK core library issues (core, async, ...); use area-vm or area-web for platform specific libraries. labels Sep 11, 2013
@kevmoo kevmoo added type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug and removed priority-unassigned labels Feb 29, 2016
@lrhn lrhn added the core-m label Aug 11, 2017
@lrhn lrhn added core-n and removed core-m labels Sep 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-core-library SDK core library issues (core, async, ...); use area-vm or area-web for platform specific libraries. core-n type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants