Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[unittest] replace expectAsync* with runZonedExperimental? #12077

Closed
jmesserly opened this issue Jul 26, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

[unittest] replace expectAsync* with runZonedExperimental? #12077

jmesserly opened this issue Jul 26, 2013 · 1 comment
Labels
area-test Cross-cutting test issues (use area- labels for specific failures; not used for package:test). type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug

Comments

@jmesserly
Copy link

runZonedExperimental would allow test(...) to intercept "runAsync" calls in the test body and wait for them to complete. That way, you never need to worry about forgetting an "expectAsync" call somewhere.
@jmesserly jmesserly added Type-Enhancement area-test Cross-cutting test issues (use area- labels for specific failures; not used for package:test). labels Jul 26, 2013
@jmesserly
Copy link
Author

I presume this is now obsolete in package:test

@kevmoo kevmoo added type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug and removed triaged labels Mar 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area-test Cross-cutting test issues (use area- labels for specific failures; not used for package:test). type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kevmoo @jmesserly