Last 7 days

• Dec 21, 2009

  issue 15 (New Preference To Hide Login Link) commented on by me...@excite.com   -   I agree. Quite a few people have registered through the login thinking they were subscribing.

  I agree. Quite a few people have registered through the login thinking they were subscribing.

Last 30 days

• Dec 14, 2009

  issue 21 (Carrington-blog ignores WP's page_on_front setting) commented on by rich.manalang   -   I'm trying to fix this myself, but can't seem to find where this is checked in other themes. I suspect this is broken due to the context. Although Carrington Text works with this option just fine.

  I'm trying to fix this myself, but can't seem to find where this is checked in other themes. I suspect this is broken due to the context. Although Carrington Text works with this option just fine.
• Dec 14, 2009

  issue 21 (Carrington-blog ignores WP's page_on_front setting) reported by rich.manalang   -   What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Configure WP to use a static page as the front page (Settings > Reading > Front Page Display > Static page 2. Navigate to the home page What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I should see the static page instead of the blog style page What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Carrington Blog 2.2 Please provide any additional information below. Is there a work around for this?

  What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Configure WP to use a static page as the front page (Settings > Reading > Front Page Display > Static page 2. Navigate to the home page What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I should see the static page instead of the blog style page What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Carrington Blog 2.2 Please provide any additional information below. Is there a work around for this?
• Dec 04, 2009

  issue 20 (Mobile: BlackBerry Browser in OS 5.0 interprets viewport met...) Summary changed by alexkingorg   -  

  Summary: Mobile: BlackBerry Browser in OS 5.0 interprets viewport meta tag poorly

  Summary: Mobile: BlackBerry Browser in OS 5.0 interprets viewport meta tag poorly
• Dec 04, 2009

  issue 20 (BlackBerry Browser in OS 5.0 interprets viewport meta tag po...) reported by alexkingorg   -   The iPhone viewport meta tag: <meta name="viewport" content="width=320; initial-scale=1.0; maximum-scale=1.0; user-scalable=0;"/> http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/AppleApplications/Reference/SafariHTMLRef/Articles/MetaTags.html is being poorly interpreted by the BlackBerry browser on some devices in OS 5.0. While the iPhone will go full-width even when a page with the meta tag (specifying 320) is loaded in landscape mode (480), the BlackBerry browser instead shows ugly empty space on the left. Removing the width seems like the best approach (iPhone resolution will surely change in the future), but testing is needed on the iPhone and Android to see what ramifications this will have. <rant>If the BlackBerry browser devs wanted to be clever and support this meta tag, they should have done so with the same implementation approach as the iPhone. Having to add code now to address their different handling of this just pisses me off.</rant>

  The iPhone viewport meta tag: <meta name="viewport" content="width=320; initial-scale=1.0; maximum-scale=1.0; user-scalable=0;"/> http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/AppleApplications/Reference/SafariHTMLRef/Articles/MetaTags.html is being poorly interpreted by the BlackBerry browser on some devices in OS 5.0. While the iPhone will go full-width even when a page with the meta tag (specifying 320) is loaded in landscape mode (480), the BlackBerry browser instead shows ugly empty space on the left. Removing the width seems like the best approach (iPhone resolution will surely change in the future), but testing is needed on the iPhone and Android to see what ramifications this will have. <rant>If the BlackBerry browser devs wanted to be clever and support this meta tag, they should have done so with the same implementation approach as the iPhone. Having to add code now to address their different handling of this just pisses me off.</rant>
• Dec 02, 2009

  issue 19 (Abstract Single template selection like General template sel...) reported by alexkingorg   -   Use General as a guide, create a new function for each case in the switch in the cfct_choose_single_template() function. This will allow new criteria to be considered as a first class citizen (priority can be set) instead of having to wait until the end to jump in.

  Use General as a guide, create a new function for each case in the switch in the cfct_choose_single_template() function. This will allow new criteria to be considered as a first class citizen (priority can be set) instead of having to wait until the end to jump in.
• Dec 02, 2009

  issue 14 (Patch Submission - Child Themes Capability) commented on by alexkingorg   -   Do handle this properly is quite a bit more in-depth that I'd hoped, unfortunately. To be useful in Carrington, the child theme feature should allow the child theme to add various templates and have those templates be picked up by the Carrington template selection engine. This means changes to: - `cfct_filename()` - `cfct_template_file()` - `cfct_default_file()` - `cfct_load_plugins()` - `cfct_files()` - `cfct_author_templates()` - `cfct_cat_templates()` - `cfct_comment_templates()` - `cfct_filter_files()` - `cfct_meta_templates()` - `cfct_parent_templates()` - `cfct_role_templates()` - `cfct_single_templates()` - `cfct_tag_templates()` Basically, every reference to files and every interaction with the available templates arrays will need to change. The available files needs to be a combined list from the parent and child theme. Instead of having an array of file names, there needs to be an associative array of file names with file paths as the value (where the path = the parent or child file, as appropriate). This is a worthwhile change to make, but it's also a fundamental change in how the template selection currently works. It's likely the entire system will be rewritten in order to do this cleanly.

  Do handle this properly is quite a bit more in-depth that I'd hoped, unfortunately. To be useful in Carrington, the child theme feature should allow the child theme to add various templates and have those templates be picked up by the Carrington template selection engine. This means changes to: - `cfct_filename()` - `cfct_template_file()` - `cfct_default_file()` - `cfct_load_plugins()` - `cfct_files()` - `cfct_author_templates()` - `cfct_cat_templates()` - `cfct_comment_templates()` - `cfct_filter_files()` - `cfct_meta_templates()` - `cfct_parent_templates()` - `cfct_role_templates()` - `cfct_single_templates()` - `cfct_tag_templates()` Basically, every reference to files and every interaction with the available templates arrays will need to change. The available files needs to be a combined list from the parent and child theme. Instead of having an array of file names, there needs to be an associative array of file names with file paths as the value (where the path = the parent or child file, as appropriate). This is a worthwhile change to make, but it's also a fundamental change in how the template selection currently works. It's likely the entire system will be rewritten in order to do this cleanly.
• Nov 30, 2009

  issue 14 (Patch Submission - Child Themes Capability) Labels changed by alexkingorg   -  

  Labels: Priority-High −Priority-Medium

  Labels: Priority-High −Priority-Medium
• Nov 30, 2009

  issue 14 (Patch Submission - Child Themes Capability) commented on by marlfoskr   -   This patch works well for allowing Child themes to override template files that already exist in the Parent theme. It does not allow Child themes to add additional template files that do not exist in the Parent theme. We plan to address this issue in the next release.

  This patch works well for allowing Child themes to override template files that already exist in the Parent theme. It does not allow Child themes to add additional template files that do not exist in the Parent theme. We plan to address this issue in the next release.

Earlier this year

• Nov 25, 2009

  r449 (hopefully a better fix for the posts_per_page issue) committed by alexkingorg   -   hopefully a better fix for the posts_per_page issue

  hopefully a better fix for the posts_per_page issue
• Nov 24, 2009

  issue 18 (Post-level templates should fall back on Page-level template...) Status changed by alexkingorg   -   So to be more precise, the request is for the Post context to also cycle through the General context before selecting the *-default.php file. This sounds like a reasonable request with few (if any) bad side effects.

  Status: Accepted

  So to be more precise, the request is for the Post context to also cycle through the General context before selecting the *-default.php file. This sounds like a reasonable request with few (if any) bad side effects.

  Status: Accepted
• Nov 23, 2009

  issue 18 (Post-level templates should fall back on Page-level template...) reported by marlfoskr   -   It would be useful to have post-level template files, like excerpt/ and content/ fall back on page context if no post context file is found. For example, this would allow for content/single.php to pull that template file on single pages.

  It would be useful to have post-level template files, like excerpt/ and content/ fall back on page context if no post context file is found. For example, this would allow for content/single.php to pull that template file on single pages.
• Nov 19, 2009

  issue 14 (Patch Submission - Child Themes Capability) commented on by dancameron   -   @catherinesings The theme I included isn't for use, only for testing purposes for Alex and the team. @Alex and the team - please consider including this into core in your next update. We're launching a major network -- today -- with this code. ( hint: om :) )

  @catherinesings The theme I included isn't for use, only for testing purposes for Alex and the team. @Alex and the team - please consider including this into core in your next update. We're launching a major network -- today -- with this code. ( hint: om :) )
• Nov 19, 2009

  issue 14 (Patch Submission - Child Themes Capability) commented on by catherinesings   -   I tried to use this child theme here: http://code.google.com/p/carrington/issues/detail?id=14 and I can't get my custom css to show. I also need to know how to remove the "functions work" text from the header. Here is the style.css: /* Theme Name: Carrington Child Theme Theme URI: http://smallbrewers.com/blog Description: This is a child theme for CA Small Craft Brewers Version: beta Author: Dan Cameron/CatherineScholz Author URI: http://catswebweave.com Template: carrington-blog Nothing special, just a child theme style sheet. Of course it still needs to be loaded in a new default header. */ body { background: #fff; color: #000000; font: 14px/18px helvetica, arial, sans-serif; } On Nov 11, 8:54 pm, Alex King <alexking...@gmail.com> wrote: > You may want to look at this: > > http://code.google.com/p/carrington/issues/detail?id=14 > > 2009/11/11 Jesús Zuleta <jesuszul...@gmail.com>: > > > Yes it the support child themes to create this css > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:53 PM, lstelie <lste...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> Does Carrington Blog 2.2 support child themes ? > > >> I tried it (to ease upgrade by separating my own modifications from > >> regular files) and > >> mychildtheme/header/header-defaulf.php > >> doesn't seem to be taken in account > > >> Thanks in advance > > >> Luc

  I tried to use this child theme here: http://code.google.com/p/carrington/issues/detail?id=14 and I can't get my custom css to show. I also need to know how to remove the "functions work" text from the header. Here is the style.css: /* Theme Name: Carrington Child Theme Theme URI: http://smallbrewers.com/blog Description: This is a child theme for CA Small Craft Brewers Version: beta Author: Dan Cameron/CatherineScholz Author URI: http://catswebweave.com Template: carrington-blog Nothing special, just a child theme style sheet. Of course it still needs to be loaded in a new default header. */ body { background: #fff; color: #000000; font: 14px/18px helvetica, arial, sans-serif; } On Nov 11, 8:54 pm, Alex King <alexking...@gmail.com> wrote: > You may want to look at this: > > http://code.google.com/p/carrington/issues/detail?id=14 > > 2009/11/11 Jesús Zuleta <jesuszul...@gmail.com>: > > > Yes it the support child themes to create this css > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:53 PM, lstelie <lste...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> Does Carrington Blog 2.2 support child themes ? > > >> I tried it (to ease upgrade by separating my own modifications from > >> regular files) and > >> mychildtheme/header/header-defaulf.php > >> doesn't seem to be taken in account > > >> Thanks in advance > > >> Luc
• Nov 12, 2009

  issue 17 (Unexpected call to method or property access on IEPNGFix) commented on by mrtnkl42   -   Got the same error.

  Got the same error.
• Oct 28, 2009

  r448 (Wrapped comments_popup_link code in is_singular check (funct...) committed by marlfoskr   -   Wrapped comments_popup_link code in is_singular check (function behavior changed in 2.8.0)

  Wrapped comments_popup_link code in is_singular check (function behavior changed in 2.8.0)
• Oct 28, 2009

  r447 (Wrapped comments_popup_link code in is_singular check (funct...) committed by marlfoskr   -   Wrapped comments_popup_link code in is_singular check (function behavior changed in 2.8.0)

  Wrapped comments_popup_link code in is_singular check (function behavior changed in 2.8.0)
• Oct 13, 2009

  issue 9 (query_posts not working) commented on by brad.simmons   -   i'm not familiar with how google code works. does that mean if i download what's listed at carrington jam 1.3 today, it will fix this problem that was in carrington jam 1.3 before?

  i'm not familiar with how google code works. does that mean if i download what's listed at carrington jam 1.3 today, it will fix this problem that was in carrington jam 1.3 before?
• Oct 12, 2009

  issue 17 (Unexpected call to method or property access on IEPNGFix) Status changed by alexkingorg   -  

  Status: Invalid

  Status: Invalid
• Oct 10, 2009

  issue 17 (Unexpected call to method or property access on IEPNGFix) reported by beersage   -   What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Logging into http://farmball.com/boston in IE6. 2. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I get a debug error, "Unexpected call to method or property access" blaming the line: IEPNGFix.process(element, 0); - I was told that element hasn't been defined anywhere within this file: http://pastie.org/648568 - Is it defined elsewhere? What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Latest stable version of Carrington, Windows XP, IE 6 Please provide any additional information below.

  What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Logging into http://farmball.com/boston in IE6. 2. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I get a debug error, "Unexpected call to method or property access" blaming the line: IEPNGFix.process(element, 0); - I was told that element hasn't been defined anywhere within this file: http://pastie.org/648568 - Is it defined elsewhere? What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Latest stable version of Carrington, Windows XP, IE 6 Please provide any additional information below.
• Oct 06, 2009

  issue 16 (2 issues found in WP_DEBUG mode) Status changed by alexkingorg   -   PHP Notices are harmless. http://code.google.com/p/carrington/source/detail?r=446

  Status: Verified

  PHP Notices are harmless. http://code.google.com/p/carrington/source/detail?r=446

  Status: Verified
• Oct 06, 2009

  r446 (suppress harmless PHP notices) committed by alexkingorg   -   suppress harmless PHP notices

  suppress harmless PHP notices
• Oct 06, 2009

  issue 16 (2 issues found in WP_DEBUG mode) reported by beersage   -   What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Turning on WP_debug mode 2. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? No visible issue. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Latest stable download, WIN XP. FF 3.5. Please provide any additional information below. WP_DEBUG outputs the following 2 errors: Undefined index: page in /wp-content/themes/carrington-blog/functions/admin.php on line 228 Notice: Undefined index: page in /wp-content/themes/carrington-blog/carrington-core/carrington.php on line 60

  What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Turning on WP_debug mode 2. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? No visible issue. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Latest stable download, WIN XP. FF 3.5. Please provide any additional information below. WP_DEBUG outputs the following 2 errors: Undefined index: page in /wp-content/themes/carrington-blog/functions/admin.php on line 228 Notice: Undefined index: page in /wp-content/themes/carrington-blog/carrington-core/carrington.php on line 60
• Oct 03, 2009

  r445 (support for sub-dirs in misc calls) committed by alexkingorg   -   support for sub-dirs in misc calls

  support for sub-dirs in misc calls
• Oct 01, 2009

  issue 9 (query_posts not working) commented on by dancameron   -   Nice, thanks Alex.

  Nice, thanks Alex.
• Oct 01, 2009

  issue 15 (New Preference To Hide Login Link) Labels changed by alexkingorg   -  

  Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect

  Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect
• Oct 01, 2009

  issue 9 (query_posts not working) Status changed by alexkingorg   -   Should be resolved with r444 http://code.google.com/p/carrington/source/detail?r=444

  Status: Fixed

  Should be resolved with r444 http://code.google.com/p/carrington/source/detail?r=444

  Status: Fixed
• Oct 01, 2009

  r444 (should fix the bleeding of the posts per archive page settin...) committed by alexkingorg   -   should fix the bleeding of the posts per archive page setting into other category queries

  should fix the bleeding of the posts per archive page setting into other category queries
• Sep 23, 2009

  issue 11 (<img src="<?php echo get_post_meta($post->ID, "thumb", $sing...) commented on by lukescammell   -   Perfect Husky, thanks! This now works just as I always assumed it would! I must have missed this in the Carrington documentation somewhere... global $post; $year = get_post_meta($post->ID, 'Year', true); echo $year;

  Perfect Husky, thanks! This now works just as I always assumed it would! I must have missed this in the Carrington documentation somewhere... global $post; $year = get_post_meta($post->ID, 'Year', true); echo $year;
• Sep 22, 2009

  issue 11 (<img src="<?php echo get_post_meta($post->ID, "thumb", $sing...) commented on by husky.biped   -   Hey Lukescammell, Alex clued me in on another forum that this is an issue of variable scope: http://carringtontheme.com/2009/06/remember-variable-scope/ It works perfectly now, and I have a feeling it will work for you too..

  Hey Lukescammell, Alex clued me in on another forum that this is an issue of variable scope: http://carringtontheme.com/2009/06/remember-variable-scope/ It works perfectly now, and I have a feeling it will work for you too..
• Sep 22, 2009

  issue 11 (<img src="<?php echo get_post_meta($post->ID, "thumb", $sing...) commented on by smcgregor   -   Hey Lukescammell, Alex clued me in on another forum that this is an issue of variable scope: http://carringtontheme.com/2009/06/remember-variable-scope/ It works perfectly now, and I have a feeling it will work for you too..

  Hey Lukescammell, Alex clued me in on another forum that this is an issue of variable scope: http://carringtontheme.com/2009/06/remember-variable-scope/ It works perfectly now, and I have a feeling it will work for you too..
• Sep 22, 2009

  issue 11 (<img src="<?php echo get_post_meta($post->ID, "thumb", $sing...) commented on by lukescammell   -   I'm with husky.biped on this one as well - I just cannot convince content- default.php to accept any known form of get_post_meta(), it always turns up empty. However, inserting the same code (see below) into single.php of the default Wordpress 2.8.4 theme bring up the expected result. I would love to have this fixed in the otherwise excellent JAM theme ;) $year = get_post_meta($post->ID, 'Year', true); echo $year;

  I'm with husky.biped on this one as well - I just cannot convince content- default.php to accept any known form of get_post_meta(), it always turns up empty. However, inserting the same code (see below) into single.php of the default Wordpress 2.8.4 theme bring up the expected result. I would love to have this fixed in the otherwise excellent JAM theme ;) $year = get_post_meta($post->ID, 'Year', true); echo $year;
• Sep 17, 2009

  issue 11 (<img src="<?php echo get_post_meta($post->ID, "thumb", $sing...) commented on by husky.biped   -   I totally disagree with the comments here. This has nothing to do with the / being removed. The get_post_meta() is returned empty. Do this: Create a post and add a custom field of foo with a value of bar. Then add this to any of the post templates: <?php echo get_post_meta($post->ID, 'foo', true); ?> The result should be 'bar' But it is '' Thanks

  I totally disagree with the comments here. This has nothing to do with the / being removed. The get_post_meta() is returned empty. Do this: Create a post and add a custom field of foo with a value of bar. Then add this to any of the post templates: <?php echo get_post_meta($post->ID, 'foo', true); ?> The result should be 'bar' But it is '' Thanks
• Sep 16, 2009

  issue 9 (query_posts not working) commented on by brad.simmons   -   you can read about my experiences with this problem here - http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311391?replies=11

  you can read about my experiences with this problem here - http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311391?replies=11
• Sep 12, 2009

  issue 15 (New Preference To Hide Login Link) reported by brandonh   -   Simple Feature Request: As part of the Carrington preferences, it would be great if there were a way to turn on and off the "Login" link which shows-up on the theme. Having the Login link show-up on sites which do not require Wordpress accounts confuses people and it would be nice if there were an easy way to turn the link on and off by a preference rather than editing the theme in some shape or form. Thanks!

  Simple Feature Request: As part of the Carrington preferences, it would be great if there were a way to turn on and off the "Login" link which shows-up on the theme. Having the Login link show-up on sites which do not require Wordpress accounts confuses people and it would be nice if there were an easy way to turn the link on and off by a preference rather than editing the theme in some shape or form. Thanks!
• Aug 31, 2009

  r443 (reset post to original after getting about content) committed by alexkingorg   -   reset post to original after getting about content

  reset post to original after getting about content
• Aug 30, 2009

  issue 14 (Patch Submission - Child Themes Capability) commented on by dancameron   -   Here you go, it's pretty straight forward but I added some comments within each template. I used the carrington-blog as the parent.

  Here you go, it's pretty straight forward but I added some comments within each template. I used the carrington-blog as the parent.
• Aug 30, 2009

  issue 14 (Patch Submission - Child Themes Capability) changed by alexkingorg   -   This looks like an interesting approach. Perhaps you could create a proof-of-concept child theme (something very simple) that implements this so we can test it further before including it in core?

  Status: Accepted

  Owner: alexkingorg

  This looks like an interesting approach. Perhaps you could create a proof-of-concept child theme (something very simple) that implements this so we can test it further before including it in core?

  Status: Accepted

  Owner: alexkingorg
• Aug 27, 2009

  issue 14 (Patch Submission - Child Themes Capability) Labels changed by alexkingorg   -  

  Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect

  Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect
• Aug 27, 2009

  issue 14 (Patch Submission - Child Themes Capability) reported by dancameron   -   I have a project that's going to require child themes and since I'd love to use Carrington core for this project I made a patch to the utility within core. My solution is pretty rudimentary, it's basically overriding the CFCT_PATH with STYLESHEETPATH ( used for all non-child themes now ) and if no file exists then it uses the CFCT_PATH ( used for child-themes ). This would allow for a child theme to override templates while utilizing the framework. For example, /header/home.php in the child theme would be picked up if the parent theme either had the same template or the default one (/header/header-default.php). If not acceptable please consider a solution or give me feedback in order for me to improve it.

  I have a project that's going to require child themes and since I'd love to use Carrington core for this project I made a patch to the utility within core. My solution is pretty rudimentary, it's basically overriding the CFCT_PATH with STYLESHEETPATH ( used for all non-child themes now ) and if no file exists then it uses the CFCT_PATH ( used for child-themes ). This would allow for a child theme to override templates while utilizing the framework. For example, /header/home.php in the child theme would be picked up if the parent theme either had the same template or the default one (/header/header-default.php). If not acceptable please consider a solution or give me feedback in order for me to improve it.
• Aug 25, 2009

  issue 12 (Carrington JAM: <head> content loaded in <body>) commented on by trevorchowfraser   -   Hi Alex, By your answer, I think you might have misunderstood what I'm describing. But anyway, I figured out that this only happens when CFCT_DEBUG is on. During normal operation, all of the <script>s and <link>s are loaded in the <head> and not in the <body>. Just thought I would share.

  Hi Alex, By your answer, I think you might have misunderstood what I'm describing. But anyway, I figured out that this only happens when CFCT_DEBUG is on. During normal operation, all of the <script>s and <link>s are loaded in the <head> and not in the <body>. Just thought I would share.
• Aug 24, 2009

  issue 9 (query_posts not working) commented on by dancameron   -   I ran into the same issue last week and I tried everything. I'm hoping it gets resolved soon but for now I had to use a count ( $count++; ).

  I ran into the same issue last week and I tried everything. I'm hoping it gets resolved soon but for now I had to use a count ( $count++; ).
• Aug 16, 2009

  2 issues changed by alexkingorg   -   Issues 6, 8

  Issues 6, 8
• Aug 16, 2009

  carrington-jam-1.3.zip (Carrington JAM 1.3) file uploaded by alexkingorg   -  

  Labels: Featured

  Labels: Featured
• Aug 16, 2009

  r442 (back to trunk) committed by alexkingorg   -   back to trunk

  back to trunk
• Aug 16, 2009

  r441 (tagging 1.3) committed by alexkingorg   -   tagging 1.3

  tagging 1.3
• Aug 16, 2009

  r440 (upping version, using tag for core) committed by alexkingorg   -   upping version, using tag for core

  upping version, using tag for core
• Aug 16, 2009

  carrington-mobile-1.1.zip (Carrington Mobile 1.1) file uploaded by alexkingorg   -  

  Labels: Featured

  Labels: Featured
• Aug 16, 2009

  r439 (tagging 1.1) committed by alexkingorg   -   tagging 1.1

  tagging 1.1
• Aug 16, 2009

  r438 (latest core) committed by alexkingorg   -   latest core

  latest core