Few surprises with the img element:
It's a popular element; most pages, apparently, have an image somewhere. Most people give at least some of their images dimensions. Specifying the border is common too. Our guess (unverified) is that people are generally turning the border off (historically, images by default have a blue/purple border around them when they are part of a link).
Around three quarters of pages with images have at least one
image with an alt attribute.
Comparatively few pages align their images with the
align attribute. (The cynical amongst us concluded
from this that most people probably put their images in tables and
align the tables instead.) Even fewer give their images the
hspace and vspace attributes
(non-standard extensions equivalent to CSS margins). The
valign attribute is virtually unused.
Image maps are not used on most pages, but they are
used. In fact, nearly ten percent of pages in the sample used them,
which is quite significant when you stop to think about when you
last saw an image map. The numbers here map reasonably closely to
the number of pages that use map and area
elements, so this isn't a false positive:
The title attribute enjoys some use. We wonder,
though, if, if IE stopped showing the alt attribute as
a tooltip, we would see a big increase in the number of pages that
used title and a big decrease in the number
of pages using the alt attribute.
Something that we found interesting in this data is the
relatively low number of pages that use onmouseover
and onmouseout. This likely maps quite closely to the
number of pages doing image rollovers. It would be interesting to
compare the results one would get by segregating pages by the year
of their Last-Modified headers, to see if that makes a
difference.
Another attribute that is used relatively rarely is
ismap. Accessibility evangelism efforts can take from
these results that server-side image maps are less of a problem
than, say, the use of presentational markup.
Speaking of accessibility, the longdesc attribute
did register as one of the top 1000 most-used attributes,
but it isn't clear whether those hits were legitimate uses or
merely programs being thorough (and useless). The latter is not
unheard of; for example the HTML4 DTD says that the default value
of the a element's shape attribute is
"rect", and so many pages actually explicitly and
uselessly say <a href="..." shape="rect">. (You can
see from the fact that approximately no pages use the
coords attribute with the a
element that in fact those cases of shape are indeed
all bogus — you can see above that with the area
element the coords attribute is used on more pages
than shape.)